Erdős Problem 535 #
References:
- erdosproblems.com/535
- [Er64] P. Erdős, On a problem in elementary number theory and a combinatorial problem. Math. Comp. (1964), 644–646.
- [AbHa70] H. L. Abbott and D. Hanson, An extremal problem in number theory. Bull. London Math. Soc. (1970), 324–326.
- [Er73] P. Erdős, Problems and results on combinatorial number theory, in A Survey of Combinatorial Theory, North-Holland, 1973.
No r-subset has constant pairwise GCD with coprime quotients.
Equations
Instances For
All elements of A are positive and have exactly k prime factors,
counted with multiplicity.
Erdős [Er73] explains that Abbott pointed out the ordinary sunflower conjecture does not seem to suffice for Problem 535; the corrected stronger auxiliary statement uses $Ω$, not $ω$.
Equations
- Erdos535.AllBigOmega k A = ∀ a ∈ A, 1 ≤ a ∧ ArithmeticFunction.cardFactors a = k
Instances For
f r N is the maximum size of a subset A ⊆ {1,…,N} such that no r-element
subset of A has constant pairwise GCD.
Equations
Instances For
Let $r \geq 3$, and let $f_r(N)$ denote the size of the largest subset of $\{1,\ldots,N\}$ such that no subset of size $r$ has the same pairwise greatest common divisor between all elements. Erdős [Er64] proved that $f_3(N) > N^{c/\log\log N}$ for some constant $c > 0$, and conjectured this should also be an upper bound; here we state the conjectural upper bound for all $r \geq 3$.
See also [536].
Erdős [Er73] records that Abbott pointed out the ordinary sunflower conjecture does not seem to suffice here. The stronger auxiliary conjecture uses $Ω(n)=k$, i.e. prime factors counted with multiplicity; this stronger statement would imply the conjectured upper bound for $f_r(N)$.
For the stronger $Ω(n)=k$ variant above, the Erdős–Rado method gives the weaker bound $c_r^k \cdot k!$; see Erdős [Er73].