Mathoverflow 34145 #
Can the unit square be covered by $1/k$-by-$1/(k+1)$ rectangles (across $1 \le k$ natural)?
I am deliberately not requiring that the rotations can only be $0^\circ, 90^\circ, 180^\circ, \text{ or } 270^\circ$.
Because of indexing, since n : ℕ starts at 0, we change the side lengths to $1 / (n + 1)$ and
$1 / (n + 2)$, so that the first rectangle is $1/1$ by $1/2$, the second is $1/2$ by $1/3$, etc.
Reference: mathoverflow/34145 asked by user Kaveh
A rectangle is specified by its width, height, starting point, and rotation.
The rectangle is assumed to start in the lower left corner. For example, the unit square
$\{ (x, y) \mid 0 \le x \le 1, 0 \le y \le 1 \}$ is specified as ⟨1, 1, (0, 0), 0⟩
- width : ℝ
- height : ℝ
- rotation : Real.Angle
Instances For
A combination of a rotation and a translation to map the standard rectangle to the desired rectangle.
Equations
Instances For
Converts a rectangle to a set in ℝ × ℝ.
Equations
Instances For
The standard Lebesgue measure on ℝ².
Equations
Instances For
lbMeasure is invariant under rigidMotion start θ.
The Lebesgue measure of the unit square is 1.
Can a unit square be covered by rectangles of width 1 / (n + 1) and height 1 / (n + 2)?
Equivalently, can a unit square be packed with rectangles of width 1 / (n + 1) and height
1 / (n + 2)?
It is known that packing the rectangles into a square of side length 133/132 is possible.
Reference: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0097316594901163
It is known that packing the rectangles into a square of side length 501/500 is possible.
Reference: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167506008706009