Documentation

FormalConjectures.ErdosProblems.«997»

Erdős Problem 997 #

References:

Call $x_1,x_2,\ldots \in (0,1)$ well-distributed if, for every $\epsilon>0$, if $k$ is sufficiently large then, for all $n>0$ and intervals $I\subseteq [0,1]$, $\lvert \# \{ n < m\leq n+k : x_m\in I\} - \lvert I\rvert k\rvert < \epsilon k.$

The notion of a well-distributed sequence was introduced by Hlawka and Petersen [Hl55].

Equations
  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
    theorem Erdos997.erdos_997 :
    sorry ∀ (α : ), ¬IsWellDistributed fun (n : ) => Int.fract (α * (Nat.nth Nat.Prime n))

    Is it true that, for every $\alpha$, the sequence $\{ \alpha p_n\}$ is not well-distributed, if $p_n$ is the sequence of primes?

    theorem Erdos997.erdos_997.variants.lacunary (n : ) (h : IsLacunary n) :
    ∀ᵐ (α : ), ¬IsWellDistributed fun (k : ) => Int.fract (α * (n k))

    Erdős proved that, if $n_k$ is a lacunary sequence, then the sequence $\{ \alpha n_k\}$ is not well-distributed for almost all $\alpha$.

    He also claimed in [Er64b] to have proved that there exists an irrational $\alpha$ for which $\{\alpha p_n\}$ is not well-distributed. He later retracted this claim in [Er85e], saying "The theorem is no doubt correct and perhaps will not be difficult to prove but I never was able to reconstruct my 'proof' which perhaps never existed."

    The existence of such an $\alpha$ was established by Champagne, Le, Liu, and Wooley [CLLW24].