Erdős Problem 74 #
Reference: erdosproblems.com/74
For a given subgraph A
, this is the set of all numbers k
such that A
can be made
bipartite by deleting k
edges.
Equations
- Erdos74.SimpleGraph.edgeDistancesToBipartite A = {x : ℕ | ∃ (E : Set (Sym2 V)) (_ : (A.deleteEdges E).coe.IsBipartite), E.ncard = x}
Instances For
The set of edge distances to a bipartite graph is always non-empty because deleting all edges from a graph makes it bipartite.
The minimum number of edges that must be deleted from a subgraph A
to make it bipartite.
Equations
Instances For
For a graph G
and a number n
, this is the set of minEdgeDistToBipartite A
for all
induced subgraphs A
of G
on n
vertices.
Equations
Instances For
The set of minimum edge distances to bipartite for subgraphs of size n
is bounded above.
A graph on n
vertices has at most n choose 2
edges, and deleting all of them
makes the graph bipartite, providing a straightforward upper bound.
For a given graph $G$ and size $n$, this defines the smallest number $k$ such that any subgraph of $G$ on $n$ vertices can be made bipartite by deleting at most $k$ edges.
This value is optimal because it is the maximum of minEdgeDistToBipartite
taken
over all $n$-vertex subgraphs. This means there exists at least one $n$-vertex
subgraph that requires exactly this many edge deletions.
This is Definition 3.1 in [EHS82].
[EHS82] Erdős, P. and Hajnal, A. and Szemerédi, E., On almost bipartite large chromatic graphs Theory and practice of combinatorics (1982), 117-123.
Equations
Instances For
Let $f(n)\to \infty$ possibly very slowly. Is there a graph of infinite chromatic number such that every finite subgraph on $n$ vertices can be made bipartite by deleting at most $f(n)$ edges?
Is there a graph of infinite chromatic number such that every finite subgraph on $n$ vertices can be made bipartite by deleting at most $\sqrt{n}$ edges?